Communication with a Jew hater
The following letter was originally written by Wayne Hill to a man who hates the Jews and has allowed himself to be blinded by "the world's" propaganda. Wayne's response addresses several levels of anti-Semitism and discusses why hatred of the Jews is a "lose-lose" situation that only serves to cater to Satan and his minions. As this letter was extremely lengthy, we have posted all but a few paragraphs that were directed specifically at the recipient.
May 1, 2009
...I'm sure you know that I do not agree with your blanket statement: "Communism is Jewish." I've already said that lots of gentiles were enamored of it too, and the Russian Revolution would never have been possible without lots of Russians agreeing with the Bolsheviks. But you chose to believe otherwise. That's your choice. I guess you'll blame Obama's win on the Jews too; even if they are only .01% of the American population....
Did you ever stop to ask yourself what is the appeal of Communism? I'll tell you, since you haven't bothered to look for it. First and foremost, however, one must be without Trust in God, but relying on men, rather. I don't care what your religious background is - no one of a genuine religious ilk can buy Socialism or Communism - for it is a religion unto itself. Trusting Jews wait for Meshiach; not Mensheviks! You know nothing of religious Jews, only apostate ones. And you judge the former by the latter, which is totally unfair. I wonder if you understand what Evil is... or Free Will, or any of the other concepts that have bemused the greatest minds in the West for two millenea. Are you one of these "greatest minds"? Am I? I think not.
All "social engineers" lacking "The Teachings" (of God) create "doctrines of men" to replace Deity. Heck; even a lot of churches do that; but that is another issue... They all have a "road to utopia" which is obtainable, with THEM at the levers of power - or so they claim... and some believe.
Communism in and of itself is intellectually appealing in a way. It SOUNDS so fair, so equitable - the workers controlling production, the majority calling the shots rather than a minority. The only problem is, mankind is NOT a race of Saints - for it would take such a race to make Communism work. You should read Marx sometime, if you really want to understand its appeal. In a weird, "good natured" kind of way, it does have a certain appeal. Of course, without God it's damned, and damnable - as are all the machinations of man without God; then and now.
Even in the west, in the 1920's and 1930's, the intelligentsia was fascinated with this doctrine - and with Mussolini and even Hitler - Time Magazine's "Man of the Year" for 1934, I believe. Non-believers want to believe in SOMETHING, so they chose to believe a MAN can "bring about the millennium" rather than God, in whom they do not trust.
Many of these men, such as Koestler and George Orwell, were honest enough, after they got to see enough of the "Socialist Beast," to realize they'd been wrong and to recant of their fascination with Communism. Such men are to be celebrated. Didn't you do some dumb stuff when you were young? They did too, but they were honest enough to admit they'd been wrong. I know you must chafe at the idea that a JEW can admit he was wrong, but Koestler did - and he is not the only one by far.
Everyone knows Karl Marx was a non-believing Jew. Josef Stalin ("Man of Steel" in Russian; how special! Not his real name of course...) attended a Russian Orthodox Christian seminary as a young man. Is the Russian Orthodox Church, or Christianity, blamed for his misadventures? No. Why is it, then, that you insist on blaming Jewish People for Mr. Marx? This is disingenuous, in my opinion. Every Jew who does evil, you blame the evil on his Jewishness; even if he doesn't practice or believe the faith of his fathers. What causes products of Christian upbringing to do equally evil things, you leave misaddressed... or try to prove they're part Jewish, I suppose. I must say - that you bought into the "Hitler is part Jewish" thing left me speechless! That story was started by his detractors in the 1920's... What better way to make a fool of him? But now your sources have accepted this foolishness, and have made the ultimate Anti-Semite into a (only part, of course!) - JEW! What Hugh Trevor-Roper and William Shirer could not find, your source "HAS." Well, either this source had Divine assistance in this quest (which is VERY doubtful...) or - he was suckered into believing it. What's more, Mr. Hitler had 12 years in which to destroy every connection of his family (if any) with any alleged Jewish ancestors. And this guy manages to find it anyway? I don't believe it. Himmler was too efficient for that... More on this later.
William Jefferson Clinton ist ein Hund. Do we blame his misadventures on the Anglo-Kelts? Is it their fault we had to endure eight years of that... buffoon? Nancy Pelosi? Harry Reid? Tom Daschle? Do we curse Ireland for that abomination, Edward M. Kennedy? Are you, an Irishman, proud of Mr. Kennedy? Should I hold your race accountable for this man? No, it would be unfair, untrue, and unrealistic to do so. But this "schema" is the template you use for anyone Jewish. The "Jewish race" is responsible, and accountable, you think, for every "mis-step" a Jew takes, be he believer or not. I'll say this; if you do not believe in personal responsibility for the personal actions of individuals, then you're some sort of behavioral socialist, who apparently believes the Jewish People have a collective personality or something. I do not subscribe to such forms of superstition. And I really believe that if you thought about it, and were honest with yourself, you don't really believe it either. It's anti-Christian, and a refutation of everything in Scripture - where we ARE accountable for our actions, as individuals, whatever race or tribe we may belong to.
I will not even address your misguided comments about the Holocaust. I have talked to two people involved in the liberation of the camps at the end of the war. They're both dead now... But I'm sure their testimony would not be of interest to you in any event, as your mind is made up.
The "right wing" has expended oceans of ink in an attempt to prove that Mr. Ulanov (Lenin) was Jewish. Part Jewish, actually. Very little, in fact. Well; what about the gentile portion of his genetic heritage, which was, after all, the majority? He was a member of the hereditary Russian aristocracy, though a small fish therein. Why not blame the Russians, then, if you are compelled to place blame? What makes the Jews so special? Do you really expect me to believe that "one drop of Jewish blood" turns people into some kind of monster? I've been to synagogues on numerous occasions - they mostly look - and act - as do any other group of people. While some may resemble the stereotypical mien so cherished by Mr. Goebbels and Mr. Streicher... most do not; you can not "tell" they're JEWISH by how they look. They're just people, with everything that contains, both good and bad.
You cite Mr. Arthur Koestler's 1974 book "The Thirteenth Tribe" as proof that the Ashkenazim aren't Jewish (or more accurately, of Hebraic extraction, racially). How is it, then, that these people are "bad" because they're Jewish, if they aren't really Jewish? I trust that the utter self-contradiction of such a position is self-evident. By the way, Mr. Koestler himself was a non-believing Jew. And yet you quote him? Careful, komerad; Der Fuehrer may select you for "sondersbehandlung" for that!
Yet, after he was honest enough to confess his disillusionment with Communism, he wrote one of the most damning indictments of Communism (as practiced in Russia) I've ever read. It's called "Darkness At Noon." I'm sure you have never heard of it, for it would not fit your weltanschauung of "all Jews are evil." Another Jew who championed American values and capitalism above all else is Ayn Rand; whose works and whose character I greatly admire. She, too, wrote an incredibly damning work, her first, about what she saw in Russia right after the revolution. Her family immigrated to the U.S. About 1920. She authored, among other works, "Atlas Shrugged" - a work that, particularly in our present time, is almost psychic in its prescience. How come then, being Jewish, she wasn't a member of the vast Kosher Kabal that you imagine was gorging itself at the expense of the gentile Russians? Her family fled to America. She wrote this work, whose title I cannot recall, when she was a teenager. She was one of the great Americans, as she, being an outsider, saw more accurately than we do what we have here (or had here! Alas!) and CELEBRATED it in her writings.
Was Senator Barry Goldwater a member of the "great Kosher Conspiracy" too? I wasn't old enough to vote for him, but would have, had I been! Lyndon Johnson was preferable, then? He's a GENTILE, you know! How can you honestly believe such things?
I don't think you really know what a Jew is. It's a complex story and too much to go into here. I guess you think St. Paul was lying to us, when he said that by faith in Messiah we become "children of Abraham" and heirs to the promise? What promise? His promises to His people, Israel - JEWS!
As a thumbnail sketch - Yehuda was one of the sons of Israel, and father of one of the Twelve Tribes. By the time of the Savior, most of the other tribes had disappeared from history. The region of Yehuda, mistranslated as "Judah" by the Romans, became a word which (inaccurately) meant "all Jews." So much for the origin of the word. At the time of Abraham there were no Jews... And by Roman times "Hebrews" were living all over the known world. Ever read Acts of the Apostles? Did you note that, when the Ruach haKodesh ("Set Apart Spirit", which gentiles called "holy" - whatever that meant...) fell on the brethren, they began to speak in foreign languages, so that "Jews" from all over the world could hear "the Godspell" (argh! Origin of word "Gospel") in their own languages? Were these people of Satan too? The 12 disciples, whom Messiah said would Judge the 12 Tribes of Israel - I guess, being Jews, they were tainted with that same blood that you seem to despise, and to blame all the evil in the world upon. Was Judas then a "good Jew" for betraying this cohort of the damned, as you seem to see them? How you, who claim to be a believer in Messiah, could also believe that an entire group of people is damned and evil merely because they have "Jewish blood" (or even if they don't, if they're Khazars...) - is quite simply beyond my pale of understanding. It's in direct contradiction to the doctrine of Free Will, a refutation of the doctrine of Faith, and against every doctrine in the New Covenant, which was, by the way, written by and for Jews, initially. Would you care to explain your position in a way in which I can understand it?
(Your belief is) in direct contradiction to the doctrine of Free Will, a refutation of the doctrine of Faith, and against every doctrine in the New Covenant, which was, by the way, written by and for Jews, initially....
Is God a racist? Read Genesis: It was a "mixed multitude" that came out of Miztraim (Egypt) - hence some of them were not children of Abraham, and some were Hebrews. YHVH said that's OK, no matter where you're from, as long as you "follow the rules" you will be My People.
Recent DNA evidence (SCIENCE, which I provided to you) demonstrates a Hebrew component among Ashkenazim. Koestler didn't have this information when he wrote his book. So he was somewhat wrong, but not totally wrong. But you, as with certain ethnic groups, discount scientific evidence when it does not support preconceived notions. They can't make it because our education system is "culturally biased," they claim. Even when Asians come here and do better than native inhabitants, which of course scientifically disproves the "culturally biased" claim, they cling to their prejudices anyway, because it's what they WANT to believe, evidence to the contrary be damned. Sound familiar?
What is even more far fetched about such a position is to insist that, even though they are not racially Hebrew, they are "still Jewish (i.e., evil incarnate) somehow" and they have caused "all the evil in the world" because of their - non-Hebrew Jewishness? I, quite frankly, cannot understand.
"...as fantastic as the six million fable" you said. I don't think that position would be sustained in a fair court. Mr. Akhmedinijad (spelling? The president of Iran) shares your beliefs in that regard, however, as does Mr. David Duke, who attended a "World Without Zionism" congress in Tehran a couple years back. If you really believe such things, my advice would be to forego faith in Yeshua (His real, Hebrew name...) and convert to Islam. There, such positions as you hold would be not only ubiquitous, but welcomed and completely "orthodox." Furthermore, it is my belief that in some essential sense, you've obtained that spiritual position already.
Regarding the "Jewish Religion." While it is true that most practicing Jews do not read Scripture, they at least hear it, as a portion is recited each week in Synagogue, resulting in the entire Pentateuch being recited in a year's time. In this they are no worse than most Christians, who don't read their book either. What is worse, the "Christian book" is a very bad translation in many parts... I've spent 10 years trying to get to the bottom of the New Covenant ("Testament" is a will dealing with dead people; yet another mistranslation...) - and I think I've done a pretty thorough job. I presently am reading an Aramaic version, believed to be "the source." It was found about 100 years ago by the British in Syria, where a very old Christian church still tenuously exists...but for some reason it did not receive the attention it deserved. This is probably due to the fact that it brings into question too many of the "Church power structures" and their positions. Of course, linguistic experts have examined it and determined its apparent veracity...Word plays and parallelisms abound, which are ubiquitous in Semitic literature...such literary devices, as with rhyme, are usually lost in translation. If Aramaic were not the original language of the New Covenant it would have been impossible to "back-translate" into Aramaic and get these tendencies. Ergo, the Aramaic is the original. Thus say the experts. So much for the New Covenant being written in Greek, originally! But don't tell that to the Church! They've bet the farm on their positions and will never admit they're wrong! They may admit homosexual priests, or, as the Catholic Church does, move them around when they get into trouble...but translate the New Covenant accurately? NO WAY! Too many "sacred cows" would have to be sacrificed!
But they're just "scientists," these philologists or linguistic experts who've given credence to the work I am reading...so I would imagine you'd discount their testimony in the same fashion you do DNA evidence.
Back to "Jewish Religion." If you were genuinely familiar with it, you'd know that the Mishna is said to be the "oral teaching" received from Moshe, in addition to the Pentateuch. I believe there is no "oral doctrine." At any rate, the Talmud is an expostulation of this alleged Oral Doctrine along with copious commentary from famous rabbis down through the centuries on "both" Torahs. They frequently contradict each other, as with the proper display of the Mezzuzah. One famous rabbi says it should be displayed vertically; his son, also a famous rabbi, says it should be displayed horizontally (or vice versa; I forget the details.) So modern Jews compromise and display it halfway between these two positions. Thus, the Talmud IS a collection of the "observations of men" - and as such, mirrors the Pharisee's (hence, modern Rabbinical Judaism's) positions. While you are right, that Yeshua condemned them for placing the words of men above those of Scripture... You are very wrong in claiming it condones murder, eating blood, sex out of marriage, etc. Of course you never read it; you merely found some anti-Jewish "vomit" and shared it with others; including me. My advice? Be careful what you send, for I am very knowledgeable about things Hebrew, and also have a host of sources where I can verify them. More on that later.
When The Redeemer was condemning the Pharisees, He was attacking them for following this Mishna; which is the writings of men, after all. As with followers everywhere, then and now, they wanted to "make things easy" so they created "short cuts"...Plus, they had to posit themselves as the arbiters of Holy Writ (as the Catholic Church WELL understands!) To claim this is a specifically Jewish characteristic is just plain dishonest. Look how many "Christian" denominations there are! Look at all the charlatans, the Jim and Tammy Faye Bakkers, and their ilk. Why was the Catholic Church selling "indulgences" immediately prior to Mr. Luther's advent? Why, to make money of course! It was completely anti-scriptural. But what does that matter when there's money to be made? And you think human nature has changed, or that Jews are somehow different from other people? Rubbish!
I'll bet you do not know there is a small sect of Jews called Kairites, who follow only the Pentateuch. Of course, you do know of the Zohar and Khabbalah - both mystical mumbo-jumbo dismissed by most "serious" Jews. To insinuate, as you do, that these two works are "mainstream Judaism" would be the equivalent of a Jew claiming that Mormonism is an "authentic manifestation" of Christianity. There would be a grain of truth in this claim, as it is a recognized faith, but Mormonism is a pagan, occult cult, plain and simple, as any genuine man of faith knows. In my humble opinion, you know virtually nothing about Judaism. I'll bet you don't know that Josephus Flavius, the Roman era Jewish historian, says a lot of good things about followers of Yeshua (Jesus' real name...) - or that there are things in the Talmud which would be invaluable to believers if they knew of them. Have you read it? Of course not! You're merely quoting some bigot. The Talmud, as with all things humans have their hands in, is both true and false, both good and bad. But for all the bad and false that may be found there - there is also some spiritually very valuable material. Too much to go into here...but a lot of those Rabbis were spiritual men who genuinely sought the truth, within the bounds their lives placed on them. I realize that this sentiment isn't sufficient for you, as it doesn't demonize the entire tribe. But you of course know that I do not and never have subscribed to such a Philistine sentiment. You want monolithic evil? Look at Islam - especially today. If you're really a "Nazi" then Islam is your faith!
As for deviations from Scripture, the Catholic Church is an expert authority. Veneration of saints and images, exhuming "the saints" after a certain time to see if they've decomposed... and if they haven't, to claim it's a sign of Divine sanctification...veneration (worshipping!) of fingernails, skulls, and other attributes of Saints (ever been to Europe? They have them all over the place, there!)...Mary as the intercessor between God and man, The Pope "infallible" in matters of the spirit, the "miracle of transubstantiation, the trinity, the rosary... All of these things are purely pagan elements that now reside in the Catholic Church, and are found nowhere in Scripture.
Before you go throwing stones at the Jews for having corrupted the faith, maybe you should take a look in your own garden first! I forgot to mention "Christmas" and "Easter." Forget your "Judeo-Masonic takeover of Catholicism" with Vatican II. They were quite capable of standing genuine scripture on its head by themselves, and did so for almost two thousand years. Need we comment on the 100 years war in Europe over religion? The massacre of the Albigensians, the Cathars, the Gnostics, and other "heresies" that the Catholic Church extinguished with sword and saber? Last time I read the "10 words" (mistranslated as "commandments") it said "Thou shalt not commit murder." The New Covenant says to treat heretics as non-believers - not to massacre them! You have a great deal of nerve, to attribute waywardness from Truth as an exclusively "Jewish" phenomenon...and in so doing, to quote a Jewish book as "justification," no less!
Mr. Luther? Indeed; I have read that proto-Nazi hate-screed you cite, though if I may, the correct title is "On the Jews and their Lies." He was incensed because the Jews didn't convert to HIS new religion. Mohammed had a similar epiphany. Odd that Mr. Luther croaked right after writing it. Maybe someone was trying to tell him something? Mr. Luther, according to the doctrines of the Catholic Church, was excommunicated and went to Hell for his crimes against the church. So let me ask you: Is the Catholic Church right? Is Mr. Luther now in Hell? Or was the church "stretching things" a bit?
Can this action be attributed to "Jewish/Masonic influence" in the Church at that time? I think not! How a supposedly religious man could write such an abomination does NOT escape me: Mr. Luther was a power-hungry, misguided, delusional megalomaniac. In the work you cite he encourages the burning of synagogues (and their contents; the Pentateuch, words attributed to YHVH Himself!) - not to mention murder. A German John Brown, he was! I'm glad he died when he did. Had he lived, and had his fat little German princelings, stuffed full of the wealth pillaged from the recently disenfranchised Catholic Church, followed his advice...then it probably would have made the Spanish Inquisition look rosy by comparison! For a Catholic, you keep strange spiritual bedfellows!
Of course, his spiritual child, also born Catholic, oddly enough - and who attended a Catholic school.... Mr. Hitler - he was able to do what Martin couldn't! That there are those that think the world is a better place because of that renders me speechless, and then some. They are Godless!
Back to the Jews. They were the vessels through which Torah ("the Teaching" - from YHVH) was delivered to man, and they also provided the Messiah. Or did you forget about that? Or are those Jews different from modern Jews? For, you see, I can not follow your thought progressions. They seem utterly illogical to me. To judge them as a people rather than as individuals (the opposite inverse of what you do) - They brought salvation to the nations and provided the Messiah that all men should be saved. What other people can say that?
The Jewish People brought us knowledge of God and salvation. What other people can say that?
But what do you see? Atheist Jew Karl Marx created Communism! Atheist Jews "managed" the Russian Revolution in its early stages, at least. Ergo; Hitler was right. You take a few non-believing Jewish people and condemn the entire Jewish People because of them. I know one thing: Over the past 100 years, 21% of the Americans who have won the Nobel Prize in the sciences have been of Jewish extraction - usually non-religious but Jews just the same. Can the Irish claim any such accomplishment? Are Bono, Sen. John Murtha, and Senator Edward M. Kennedy people you are proud your nation has given the world? Why do you insist on seeing only the negative attributes of the Jews, but none of their positive contributions? Ask me, and I'll tell you what I really think.
I would imagine you've long ago thrown this letter into the recycle bin. Be it as it may. I must say the truth as I see it - but only to one who professes to be a believer. Were you a Satanist or a pagan, I would be mum. Are you willing to say, as did the 40 or so, assembled outside the "Antonia Fortress" (the Roman garrison in Jerusalem and its courtyard, recently excavated; the pavement would only hold about that many people...) and wherein the "multitude" said "His blood be upon us, and upon our children!"? Even that quote is distorted and inaccurate...too much to go into here. They had no moral right or authority to claim such a "spiritual edict" be visited upon their progeny. But don't tell that to those who do NOT believe in "free will." They WANT the Jews to be damned. Scripture also says, in the words of Messiah Himself - for as you judge, so shall YOU be judged. Do you REALLY wish to be judged with the same "fairness" you use in judging the Jews?
On to your printed material.
"The Secret Driving Force of Communism." This text (with your included notes) attempts to posit that Jews have been at war with Catholicism "forever," are "anti-spiritual" and "evil." You further add that the Catholic Church is now the lackey of "Jews and Freemasons." When in fact, then as now, the Church serves its own interests, in my opinion. I've already commented on the utter paganization of the Catholic Church. To recapitulate its "sins" here would be redundant. Cesar Borgia as pope? A Renaissance pope and gangster extraordinary! You'll have to "dig deeper" to convince me the church wasn't already hopelessly corrupt, even in the 4th Century - not to mention the 16th, or the 20th.
Even Constantine "The Great" was...well; his coinage bears on the reverse "Sol Invictus" - the Sun God. He "converted" on his deathbed so he could enjoy "both worlds". It is to him we owe the Nicene Creed, the present books of the Bible, and to a large degree, their mistranslations and distortions. He was ultimately interested in power - not spirituality. He "used" the church when he realized that, pragmatically, he could not do otherwise. I have studied this in great detail. Can't blame him on the Masons! That the Masons hate him so much is almost credit to their account! And, of course, he was an Anti-Semite, as were Origen, John Chrysostomos, and the rest. Why? Because the learned Jews had the "inside scoop" on YHVH. Solution, for IGNUNT goyim? Invent stuff and bash Jews, in order to keep hold of that all important "temporal" power (that is supposed to be so evil...)
Talk about hypocrites! The Church Fathers were mostly IGNUNT "Pharisees." At least the Jews KNEW their doctrine. The so-called Christian fathers (from about 150 CE on...) didn't even have one until Constantine invented it for them!
"Secret Driving Force" goes into great detail about Mr. Marx, who, we know, was NOT a religious Jew. Had he (God willing!) been a non-religious GENTILE, we'd not be discussing this matter at all. When religion is at issue, you use fragmented and mis-contextual Scripture in an attempt to support your position. If a Jew is involved, however, you cite race. Of course, you conveniently forget almost EVERYONE of note in the entire Pentateuch is or was Jewish, the Talmidim ("Disciples") were Jewish, Yeshua/Jesus was Jewish, everyone "saved" at "Pentecost" was Jewish, and indeed, the entire concept of Messiah and salvation is an EXCLUSIVELY Jewish doctrine or revelation. Without Jews there could NOT be a "church."
You accept that the Khazars are not Jews (from Koestler) a Jew - but only because it supports your position. So which race are you REALLY blaming for "Communism" here? The Khazars? But you say they were gentiles! They were probably mostly European with some Asiatic (Mongol) influence and some Hebrew admixture as well. As are the Russians. Look at them!
Is it then the "evil Jewish Religion" of the Mishna? I used to live in Jersey and knew quite a few of these products of the "evil Jewish Religion." They were neither evil, nor frequently practicing Jews, nor frequently very religious (except in Bentonhurst.) An example would be the composer Gershwin, or Lerner and Loewe, or Rogers and Hammerstein... ethnically Jewish, yes. But hardly monsters of the Apocalypse! Do you really think Einstein was an evil man? Or Jonas Salk? Or a friend of mine, Bob Kagan? Too bad you don't KNOW any Jews; then they would seem to be pretty human after all! Just like us, they come in all types and varieties and spiritual states. If anything, my experience has taught me that, generally, they are more ethical then gentiles, and more prone to try to "do the right thing." But that's just experience; of what use is that, when you want to demonize an entire people?
Your tome goes on to cite "Jew on his mother's side" (Ulanov/Lenin) - That's all the proof some people need, I guess. One drop is all it takes, to turn certain people into monsters! For me, a student of history since my youth, this simplistic penchant to reduce an incredibly complex evolution of peoples, places and times into a simple formula - Jewish blood equals devil - is incomprehensible. So much for Yeshua/Jesus, the apostles, the Prophets, Moses and Ahron, and all the rest, I guess! If you're gentile you're "saved." If you're an evil Jew, you're going to hell - along with their King, I suppose. How could you believe such a thing, really?
I'd like to see, out of curiosity, an OBJECTIVE account of all the officials in the first Soviet Government... and see how many gentiles are to be found; just for the sake of argument. I know about the Okhrana. Do you? They're the people who foisted the "Protocols" on mankind. OK; I'll tell you - they were the Tsarist Secret Police; much like the KGB. They were hideously anti-Jewish, which explains the Protocols. More on that later. Suffice it to say now that all their information is suspect, as are the organs that promulgated their "information" to immigre groups outside Russia - which are involved in your citations.
You leave out various historical factors. The Tsarist Government, in addition to regularly sanctioning, in the name of "Christian Love" - pogroms, isolations, pales of settlement (ghettos for Jews) and religious discrimination in government employment, also decided (after the assassination of Tsar Alexander II in 1881) to "assimilate" the Jews at the same time it was persecuting them. They were forced to go to Russian schools against their will... This created a tremendous amount of ill-will among the (not inconsiderable numbers) of Jews who lived in Russia at that time. It was, consequent to their mistreatment, only natural that they'd hate the Tsar, hate the Russian state, and hate the government's attempts to "de-Judify" them. If someone treated me that way, I'd feel the same. But of course, I know you believe they are demons living in human bodies; not real people with feelings and likes and dislikes and cares, like the rest of humanity.
Even the John Birch Society used to admit that "Jewish influence" in the Communist government dropped off to almost nil after about 1930. Your tome does not share this sentiment. It is beyond my means or interest to verify such a claim in any event.
Your tome quotes the Paris Newspaper "Le Russe Nationaliste" - but everyone knows the Tsarist Government and their sympathizers were anti-Jewish anyway, as a matter of state policy. How then can their statistics be trusted for objectivity?
Oy! So Stalin is "a Jew" based on his surname. WHEN did these alleged GYPSIES (NOT Jews) move to this "small island in Persia"? 1215 AD? This is distortion at its best. Of course, the word "Gypsies" is given in quotations, insinuating that Jews is meant. Gypsies have lived in Europe for at lease 1500 years. Maybe when the word Gypsy was given, that's what it meant? Who knows. But I know one thing; those who WANT Stalin to be a Jew will certainly grab hold of this and run a marathon with it.
I love the following line, a quote on page 65: "Today it is ALMOST COMPLETELY PROVED that Stalin had Jewish blood... "(emphasis added.) How does one ALMOST completely prove something? This is comical! Talk about "Lawyers"!
On to Mr. Koestler's book. I offer no comments. I read the work in the mid 1970's. It is interesting, and probably largely reflects the racial makeup of the so-called Ashkenazim. However; There are works which posit that a component of Jewish People fled Byzantium (also notoriously anti-Semitic) and settled in this area. The DNA evidence which I provided to you would also support (in fact, prove, to my mind) such a possibility. You discount that evidence. It doesn't fit your "belief-system." Well I'm not interested in "belief-systems" - I seek the truth. I trust the physical world (which includes science) (and which reflects the handiwork of God Himself) much more than I do you, or me, or any other "intellectual" source. Science does not lie.
Anyway, this would explain the "European" appearance of so many Ashkenazim, such as Bette Midler or many others that come to mind. But to go back to Genesis for a moment - God doesn't care about your genome - He cares about your spirit, your heart. Even the great King David; his grandmother was a Gentile. The mixed multitude that came out of Mitzraim (Egypt) could be His people, regardless of their ancestry, as long as they followed His rules. And this is the crux of where you and I disagree.
You think that "blood is everything." You are totally Nazi in that belief. I believe that what's in your Heart is everything. And on my side I have all of Scripture, as well as the words of The Messiah Himself. Even the (despised among Jews) Samaritan Woman got her wish granted by the Hand of God-in-the-Flesh, when she showed humility when speaking to Messiah. What religion do YOU practice?
You think that "blood is everything." You are totally Nazi in that belief. I believe that what's in your Heart is everything. And on my side I have all of Scripture, as well as the words of The Messiah Himself.
Race and Myth? Who wrote this? Sounds like Alfred Rosenberg or something. You know, the Nazi "philosopher" hanged at Nuermberg...
Switch to "Synagogue of Satan" by Hitchcock. NATURALLY, of course, they are the "Synagogue of Satan." Oh, I get it. We have "Replacement Theology" here. These "Ashkenazim" are the "Synagogue of Satan" because they claim they are Jews but are not. Well at least that explains SOME of what you're trying to say. But it all leads back to your premise that "The Jews are a race" - even when they are NOT (as with Khazars.) Oy! How to make any headway? If you went to Israel and saw the not inconsiderable number of "Falasha" (Black) Jews from Ethiopia, what would you say then, I wonder. But, I'm sure you'd have some 120 year old anti-Semitic rant to explain everything away.
If I recall correctly, Yoachanan ("John the Catholic"... I mean, "John the Calvinist"... I mean "John the Baptist"... a little fun at the expense of the mistranslated, distorted, fragmented and misguided "knowledge" of the "Body of Messiah"... the churches) - said that "God is able to raise of these stones, Children of Abraham." His meaning refutes, not supports, the Jewish idea about their race at the time. Ergo, with John, (as with Scripture, and with all genuine believers) race means nothing. With your author, however, the Kazars, people NOT descended from the Hebrews [whom the Church persecuted and murdered (in the crusades, in the inquisition, etc.)] are merely converts, and somehow thus not (racially) "Jewish." Logically, then, to use your own positions, this should make the Khazars "good." But we're not talking about logic here, obviously.
Are not all the Gentiles "converts" to the Trust, per St. Paul? Are not all Gentiles the "wild olive branches" grafted on to the Hebrew root? And if genuine Jewish blood is so important, why did the Gentiles not treat the Shepardic Jewish community differently than they treated other Jews? Fact is, they didn't even understand the difference! (and don't now either, for the most part.)
EVERYTHING that YHVH tells people to do is a "do", not a "be." "Follow My commandments" - Not merely "be of a certain tribe." For of these stones is He able to raise up children of Avraham.
If the Khazars could not be adapted as Jews by practice and deed, then even less so could Gentiles be adapted as "spiritual Hebrews" (in Paul's description) by faith. There is abundant evidence for this in Scripture; I shall not attempt to broach the subject in detail here. I assume (probably wrongly, to judge by your opinions) that you regularly read Scripture. I don't mean to brag, but I read Scripture from cover to cover once each year. Additionally, I seek out accurate translations of Scripture, which has been so distorted by incompetent editors, as well as those (such as Constantine) driven by personal agendas, over the centuries...
Whomever believes that race is the all-important factor in the spiritual destiny of individuals, and of peoples, is a liar. Scripture teaches us differently, from Genesis, with its "mixed multitude" who became Israelites, to Abraham, of Chaldea, to David, one forth gentile, to the gentile hoards who came to represent the bulk of His followers. Even Messiah dissuaded His disciples from teaching to Goyim... only to relent Himself, on occasion, and save them. If race is the basis of the trust, we are all surely lost and damned, and are following a lie. As St. Paul has it, "here is neither Jew nor gentile." Guess that really sticks in your craw, as it did the Nazis. You, my friend, are totally Nazi. Your spiritual allies may be found in the Islamic world. They are racists too; though more "theoretical" than practical ones. Even they do not exceed your obsession with blood - or the apparent lack of it, when it comes to the Ashkenazim...
"The Kazars practiced a mystical and pagan form of Judaism..." What? No one even KNOWS for sure exactly what they did. They probably strayed from Judaism no further than certain isolated "Christian" Holiness churches do from "orthodox" Christianity in backwater America. Gads! Sweeping statements, unsupported claims, emotional accusations, unproved postulations! You actually BELIEVE this book? There is no evidence for anything it claims! Merely accusations and unsupported charges. "Myth as History" to quote a man you probably admire greatly - Alfred Rosenberg.
My comment to you: If God holds you, and all the authors of the sources you cite, to the same standards of perfection that you demand of "the Jews" - then you are surely damned, all of you! For as you judge, so shall you be judged. My advice? Among other things, learn how to count! I quote verbatim from page 102, "Synagogue of Satan" - "One of the curious features of the Bolshevist movement is the high percentage of non-Russian elements among its leaders. Of the twenty or thirty commissaries, or leaders, who provide the central machinery of the Bolshevist movement, not less than 75% were Jews." Ok then. They don't even know how MANY "commissaries" there are. Twenty or Thirty, the text says. But they "know" somehow that: either 15 of 20 were Jews, OR 25 of 30 were Jews. Well which is it? HOW, in God's name, could you know the percentage when you don't even know the total amount???
The same text goes on to allege that the "Jewish Post International Edition, week ending January 24th, 1991. (period, sic) confirms Vladimir Lenin was Jewish." It's a recent newspaper. Who publishes it; Pamyat? (a notorious, Anti-Semitic Philo-Russian, "right wing" organization?) The Jewish Post in Jerusalem? Such an outlandish claim should be supported with page, author, publisher, etc. But I suppose I'm asking too much! We're supposed to "believe" and not question, apparently. Well I question! Mussolini said "Believe! Obey! Fight!" I am no fascist.
It goes on to claim that "The Jews" managed the gulags, and millions were killed. But in Germany, where Gentiles managed the gulags, people of your persuasion claim - what? No one was murdered? 3 were murdered? You deny the 6 million figure, yet refuse to provide another, because you all know in your heart of hearts that it's not so much the number, rather than the intent.
Adolf Hitler, 1939: "If the Jews succeed in launching the world into another war... it will result in the annihilation of the Jews of Europe." Somehow, I don't think "the Jews" caused Hitler's Wehrmacht to begin the invasion of Poland at the formerly Silesian town of Gleiwitz, on the then-border between Germany and Poland, at 4am on September 1, 1939. I think Hitler did it. He can blame the Jews all he wants - And, if he failed to live up to his promise to (completely) liquidate the Jews of Europe, it wasn't for lack of trying. For you to play the "revisionist game" and quibble about numbers still does not camouflage the intent. And; you know - I think you really know all this, though you'd probably never admit it. He said what he wanted to do. If he failed, and your "favorite" number wasn't reached... well he still tried.
I remember the refusniks, they were called. They were almost exclusively Jewish, and were persecuted in the 1960's and 1970's by your imagined "Jewish gulag system." How do you explain this? Remember Yelena Bonner? I do. Yes; she was Jewish. She was persecuted by the Soviet regime for her dissidence; as was Solzhenitsyn. I do not trust your sources and would have to check them myself. In my humble opinion, your stance as an objective source is, as the British would say, "rather doubtful."
And now, in a publication whose title must give fair-minded students of history a rude awakening, we move on to "Institute for Historical Accuracy and Veracity" - a book titled, per your notes, "A Greater Miracle; the Dead Six Million Uncovered."
Here we "learn" that Herr Hitler's paternal grandfather was a scion of no less a famous family than the Rothschilds! Well; must give them an "A" for creativity, at least. I am a scholar of WII since my teenage years, and have read every available tome of any note dealing with that war, and with Hitler. It was said that Hitler's detractors in the 1920s claimed that Alois Schickelgrueber's father was supposedly a Jew named Frankenberger. The problem is, that, as he (Alois) was a "hick" from a small town in the Austrian hinterlands (Spital it's called, in eastern Austria, in the mountains...) - there were no Jews there; least of all one named Frankenberger.
But now, you would have us believe that a scion of one of the most illustrious (and notorious) - and fabulously wealthy families of Europe, the much-fabled Rothschilds, who lived in the lap of luxury and the acme of opulence for centuries, had nothing better to do with their time than pay an impromptu conjugal visit to some Austrian hick-hut in 1836, spawning one Alois Schickelgrueber... Of course, the mother, probably illiterate and utterly "country", nonetheless recognized this halcyon stud, member of one of Europe's most exclusive aristocracies... duly making note of his patronymy, to share with her progeny.
Of course, Hitler, Himmler and company failed to cover up this cover up, so your "scholar" could find it out later... even though they ruled Germany for 12 years and Austria for 7. Amazing!
You know; if you really want people to believe this stuff, then stick to one story! Is he a Rothschild, or is he a Frankenberger? You can't have it both ways!
To quote from the missive: "Alois' father, it has been substantiated, was Leopold Frankenberger..." ARGH - as with DC Comics, what's the truth got to do, got to do with it... HOW has Frankenberger's spawning of Alois been substantiated? Again; to make such outrageous claims as this, which have been investigated fruitlessly by the best historians on the planet for decades... Well; let's suffice to say more proof than the words "...has been substantiated..." would be required by any objective audience. This isn't history, it's comedy! You really believe this stuff? REALLY? The author says also that "Hilter" (the alleged original form of "Hitler" (which was in fact Hiedler, pronounced in German HEEDler... But I'm using evil "historians" again; please forgive me!) Plus this sage opines that "Schickelgrueber sounds Jewish.... as does Hilter..." WELL... to these Keltic/French ears, "Hindenburg" might "sound Jewish" but we know he wasn't! This is LACK of genuine scholastic honesty at its WORST..."sounds Jewish" to WHOM? A Jew? An Austrian peasant? Me? What rubbish!
For the record: The picture of Alois Schickelgrueber - he looks like a typical central German Saxon; or even a Pole. But not Jewish; not at all. He doesn't even look Austrian or Bavarian. Kind of reminds me of Lech Walensa, the founder of Solidarity in Gdansk (formerly Danzig), Poland. Large, square "Saxon" head. Dolferl (a family intimate name for Hitler) must have favored his mother...
I knew about Madame Albright's family's original faith. So her family converted to avoid death? What's so unusual in that? The Jewish People have dealt with that problem for centuries in both the Christian and Muslim worlds. I'm sure they practiced their REAL religion in secret; for which I congratulate them! Who knows; maybe some day we'll have to do that! Will we? It is NOT part of their faith to confess openly, as it is ours (or mine, at least.)
As for "Judaism Discovered: A Desideratum" - he makes so many sweeping and unsupported statements such as "...contemporary Talmudists and Zionists are descendants of people who were NOT in Palestine when Jesus was crucified." No proof. No explanation. Just unsupported opinion. It's tripe, rubbish. It's easy to lie when you don't have to prove anything. That's why scholasticism and "history" were invented in the FIRST place...
Mr. Hoffman fails to provide any support for this accusation. Indeed, the scientific means by which such a point could be proved, or disproved, while available, would be exceedingly costly. I refer to DNA tests... but, of course, you do not accept them anyway. So what would we use to conduct this imaginary test?
So Mr. Hoffman "...searched the texts of Maimonides, however, for hidden Kabbalistic sympathies..." and of course, we simply "know" that he found them - for, of course, he tells us so! Jeez; I didn't even have to call Mrs. Cleo on that one! So now the great Mr. Hoffman, whom I'm sure is a Talmudic Scholar well versed in the intricacies of Rabbinic interpretation, midrash, etc...will lead us on a "magical mystery tour" and tell us what Maimonides was "REALLY" saying!
Bilge-water! I've read enough of Jewish religious literature to know that their methods of interpolation are complex and somewhat bewildering to the uninformed. I would not pretend to be an expert, as does Mr. Hoffman. I wonder what Mr. Hoffman does for a living, to make him an "expert" in so arcane a field of literary and metaphysical interpretation as this? (Probably, nothing!) (The hubris of such people has to be experienced to be believed!) I do note, however, that he lists his address as Coeur d'Arlene, Idaho - which is a stronghold of the "Church of the Creator" - a neo-Nazi group which claims that Yeshua/Jesus wasn't Jewish, etc. Oy; such an "unbiased" source, already! This "church" spawned the early 1990's "The Order."
From there we go to "The Talmud on Gentiles" posted by Seidr. Perhaps the site is aptly named. He bashes the Jews for not assimilating. Why SHOULD they? Give me one good reason?
It's nice to quote all those anti-gentile comments, which would lead to the opinion that the authors (NOT the Most High, but men!) were racists. To be fair, many small and/or persecuted groups have maintained their identity via an imagined or fanciful exclusivity. Hell; "aristocracies" do the same thing! To expect different from Rabbis in central Europe, faced with persecution and discrimination would probably be expecting too much. Additionally, even in the writings of such recent Westerners as Tennyson or Kipling, similar negative attitudes regarding non-Europeans are easy to find. Does this make them any different than any other ethnic group? No. Only a hypocrite would expect Jewish People to be any different. And I will not even condemn such attitudes...but the difference is this: Jewish leaders said such things out of a will to prevent assimilation. The British authors cited, on the other hand, were ruling the world when they uttered their jingoistic similes. Such attitudes are natural among every ethnic group. What was a barbarian to the Greek? Anyone who wasn't Greek! Mankind hasn't changed much in this regard! Every group is equally "guilty" of wanting to preserve its type.
If indeed a Rabbi said murder is OK (Bammidber raba c 21 & jalkut 772, per your article) then he was violating Scripture and the "Ten Words" ("Commandments, as mistranslated) of Moses! So to whom will the audience listen? God, or some man? Same old argument, and it exists in all peoples, all cultures, and all religions. To ascribe this to the Jews, probably the least violent of all peoples, is just plain stupid - even if some Rabbi did say it.
Again; in the next text, "Reader quotes Talmud and Kol Nidre" by same author as above...God does NOT accept human sacrifices, gentile or otherwise. In fact, His People in Israel were roundly condemned for doing the "Moloch thing." I guess you could quote "Mein Kampf" by the "Good Catholic" Adolf Hitler (never excommunicated, as WAS Luther...) and claim that it's "Catholic Doctrine" to kill people. This is so far out of left field that I don't even feel it necessary to respond. That you want to believe such things says a lot about you; if little about the cretins who said such things in the name of God (if indeed, they did) - "Jewish" or otherwise!
I do note that there are quotations from the Zohar in there, which you condemn as a "Satanic" text. Well, what DO you expect from a "Satanic Text?" "Say your prayers! Go to church! Be good?" Unlike you and your "experts" I say this: I've never read it, thus do not know what it says.
My conclusion about all of what you sent, and upon which I have commented, as it relates to my understanding of your position in life: If you do not repent of your hatred of "the Jews" then you will be judged as you have judged them. There are no appeals in the court of Yeshua ha Meshiach, ben David, melech Y'Israel! And, considering what you say about Jews... I don't think it will go well with you!
God and Jesus are not about hate. The Lord didn't hate the Romans who murdered Him. He asked that they be forgiven. You have no idea what forgiveness is about. Hence you can NOT be a true believer.
The people whom you damn and curse are not above reproach. All peoples, as all individuals - Scripture says their righteousness is "as filthy rags." That you think your righteousness is NOT so, is what will condemn you - among other things. Your brother is Lucifer, the Proud. He's so much smarter, and better, than everyone else, you know; or thinks he is, at any rate - as do you, his spiritual kin.
You are one of the most negative, hate-filled individuals I have ever known. How you wake up and live, with all that Satanic bile boiling in your belly, is beyond me. What's worse, it's directed against a people whom Adonai YHVH the Most High has said, in numerous places in Scripture, that they were/are/will be "the apple of his eye." You could NOT have read Scripture objectively, and believe as you do. Or if you did and still retain your opinions, you are a child of haSatan!
You demand perfection from Israel - but Scripture documents copiously how far they failed to measure up to that yardstick...And you think you are so much more righteous than they? Scripture says a contrite heart, God will not reject. Your heart is about as far as contrite as a heart CAN be. As you judge, so shall you be judged. You demand perfection from Israel - so perfection will be demanded of you, when you are judged. Do you really think you can make that cut?
Until and if you can make this change, your condition will not change either. You live in a poisoned world, with poison "saints" and guides whose locus is the Abyss. I will pray for you. You, along with your "friend" Texe Marrs, are as lost as lost can be.
If you've listened to anything I've said, which is doubtful... then the best thing you could do is GO to a Synagogue, and look at the people there. You'll be surprised, as they are totally human; no red tails, or hoofs, or horns, or anything! They're just like us, and just as prone to spiritual laziness, and "buying indulgences," and not reading scripture, and arrogance, and all the other vices that plague mankind. But one thing you will NOT find is the "control center" for "taking over the world." You'll have to move much higher up the food chain to find that bunch, and they're NOT religious, whatever their family culture or ancestry.
I know many Jewish People who are kind, affectionate, and very decent people. If anything, they exceed gentiles in their morality - despite what you and your "Talmud-conspiratorialists" would have us believe.
Yours in the name of my Lord and Master, *Yeshua ha Meshiach, ben David, malech Y'Israel, and in that which sent Him that we should live, not die - #Adonai YHVH
PS: Translations: *"Jesus" the Messiah, the son of David, King of Israel" and #The Lord YHVH. "He who calls upon the name of The Lord will be saved." The context refers to the name of God; not the Messiah. Do YOU know the Name of God? It's in Scripture! Why hasn't your church taught you this? You, as many, are lead astray by men. All you need to know is in Scripture. All you need is trust. Somewhere in your heart you know this. FIND it! For it was promised to us that "(God's) Teaching will be written upon your hearts..."
PPS: Here is one of the best explanations of the so called "Protocols". Also check out the Babylonian Talmud Research Guide where you will see that almost all of the alleged sections of the Talmud that your "hero" is quoting from apparently do not exist. The first one, Abhodah Zarah, is an actual "book" of the Talmud. The rest of the first page are apparently bogus. I noted, when researching this item, that some "Christian" sites claim that the "Protocols" are absolutely true and correct (HOW would they know, one wonders...) But you will have to make up your own mind; if you haven't already, which I suspect you have. The modern version of this text was done, again by the Tsarist Okhrana or Secret Police via the priest of the Russian Orthodox Church, one Reverend Pranatis, I believe it is...himself a member of the Okhrana. (Oy! Such an "objective" source!) A Canadian researcher asked him to do this research because I wanted to know the truth...Because I don't simply accept things at face value. IF the so-called Conspiracy exists, and IF they are as powerful and ubiquitous as their alleged opponents say, then HOW could they have allowed their "battle plan" to be published internationally? It defies common sence. I think it's tripe.
Unlike you, who sends out pornography, "Talmud says sex with 3 year old girls is OK... - that is an incredibly damning accusation, and one I'd want to make certain was correct before I put MY imprimateur on it, because I value my word. You, apparently, do not - and will gobble up anything, as long as it's anti-Jewish, with not even a thought as to its accuracy! Then you pass it around as if it were true, and you don't even know, and don't care - as LONG as it's anti-Jewish! You are intellectually DISHONEST!
According to Dr. David Stern, Jerusalem, a noted scholar of Old and New "Testaments" - the "unpardonable sin" mentioned by Yeshua/Jesus in - Matthew? (I forget where...) is the attribution of something that the Holy Spirit does to the hand of the Adversary. If Dr. Stern is right, and if God has ANYTHING to do with: the Jews returning to Israel, 1948, Jerusalem restored as capital in 1967, Gog and Magog attacking Israel, etc...And yet you attribute His action to the Adversary? Well, I trust you can "read between the lines" on this one. As for me, I say that God has EVERYTHING to do with those things! Hallelu Ya and Amen!